If you want to process crushed stones, choose cone crushing or counterattack crushing

When processing crushed stones, the choice between cone crushing and counterattack (impact) crushing depends on the specific requirements of the operation, including the desired output size, the type of stone, and the production capacity needed. Here are some considerations for each type of crusher:

**Cone Crushing:**

1. **Size Reduction**: Cone crushers are effective for secondary and tertiary crushing, reducing the size of the stones from medium to fine. They are not typically used for primary crushing.

2. **Shape**: Cone crushers produce a cubical shaped product, which is ideal for high-quality aggregate production. The cubic shape minimizes voids and improves the strength of the final product.

3. **Capacity**: Cone crushers generally have a higher capacity compared to impact crushers, making them suitable for high-production environments.

4. **Efficiency**: They are energy-efficient machines, as they operate at lower speeds and use a squeezing motion to crush the stones, which reduces wear on the crusher components.

5. **Hardness**: Cone crushers can handle high-hardness stones without significant wear, which is beneficial for processing abrasive materials.

**Counterattack (Impact) Crushing:**

1. **Size Reduction**: Impact crushers are used for primary, secondary, and tertiary crushing. They are particularly effective for primary crushing of materials with a high degree of fracturing and secondary crushing of materials with moderate hardness.

2. **Shape**: Impact crushers produce a more elongated and fractured product shape, which can be desirable for certain applications but may not be suitable for high-quality aggregate production.

3. **Capacity**: Impact crushers have a lower capacity compared to cone crushers, but they can handle materials with a higher moisture content and do not require a closed-circuit system for fines removal.

4. **Efficiency**: Impact crushers are energy-efficient for certain materials, as they can crush materials with a single impact, reducing energy consumption per ton of material.

5. **Hardness**: Impact crushers are less suitable for materials with high hardness, as they can cause significant wear on the crusher components.

In summary, the choice between cone crushing and counterattack crushing for processing crushed stones should be based on the specific needs of the operation, including the desired product quality, the type of stone being processed, and the production requirements. It's also important to consider the cost of ownership, maintenance requirements, and the availability of spare parts for each type of crusher.