The working difference between spring cone crusher and hydraulic cone crusher

Spring cone crusher and hydraulic cone crusher are two types of cone crushers commonly used in the mining and aggregate industries. They differ in their working principles and some key features, which affect their performance and application scenarios.

1. Working principles:

Spring cone crusher:

The spring cone crusher works on the principle of compression crushing. The central shaft is supported by springs, which allow the crusher to adjust itself according to the pressure applied. The springs also act as a safety mechanism, preventing overloading by exerting pressure on the crusher housing. The crusher's mantle and bowl liner are made of wear-resistant materials to withstand the impact of abrasive materials.

Hydraulic cone crusher:

The hydraulic cone crusher also operates on the principle of compression crushing. However, it uses hydraulic pressure to adjust the size of the discharge opening and to clear blockages. The crusher's mantle and bowl liner are also made of wear-resistant materials. The hydraulic system enables the crusher to function more efficiently and with better control over the final product size.

2. Key differences:

Spring cone crusher:

- Adjustment of the discharge opening is manual and requires the removal of the mantle for changing the settings.

- Spring-loaded mechanism for protection against overloading.

- Less precise control over the final product size.

- Generally used for intermediate and fine crushing applications.

Hydraulic cone crusher:

- Adjustment of the discharge opening is hydraulic and can be done remotely without removing the mantle.

- Faster and more precise control over the final product size.

- Better suited for crushing hard and abrasive materials.

- Can be used for a wider range of applications, including secondary and tertiary crushing.

3. Performance and application scenarios:

Spring cone crusher:

- Lower initial investment and simpler maintenance compared to hydraulic cone crushers.

- Better suited for small and medium-scale operations with limited budgets.

- Ideal for crushing moderately hard materials with intermediate and fine crushing requirements.

Hydraulic cone crusher:

- Higher initial investment but more efficient operation and longer lifespan compared to spring cone crushers.

- Suited for large-scale operations with demanding crushing requirements.

- Can handle a wider range of materials, including hard and abrasive rocks, minerals, and concrete.

In summary, the main difference between spring cone crusher and hydraulic cone crusher lies in their adjustment mechanisms, control over final product size, and application scenarios. While the spring cone crusher is more suitable for intermediate and fine crushing applications with limited budgets, the hydraulic cone crusher offers better performance, precision, and versatility for a wider range of crushing tasks.